California Court Rejects Guillermo Mata's Privacy Lawsuit Against Digital Recognition Network Over License Plate Tracking
A California appellate court has ruled that the collection of license plate data by Digital Recognition Network does not, in itself, constitute a legal harm, dismissing a class action lawsuit brought by Guillermo Mata. The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed that while Mata argued his privacy was subjectively invaded by the company's massive database of over nine billion images, he failed to show a specific, and tangible, injury such as a security breach or unauthorized use of his data. This ruling highlights a distinction in California's automated license plate recognition (ALPR) laws, which place strict requirements on public agencies but offer private companies wide leeway. While civil rights groups like the ACLU and the Electronic Frontier Foundation expressed disappointment, they argued that the collection of data without consent should be considered an initial harm. For now, the decision means that private entities can continue to harvest vehicle data for commercial use without being held accountable unless a specific misuse of that data occurs.
Sources
-
A Private Surveillance Network Built on Tow Trucks Has Scanned 9 Billion License Plates. California Courts Just Said That's Fine
Yahoo
-
San Diego appeals court finds that license plate data collection alone is not harm
San Diego Union-Tribune
-
When “Creepy” Is Not Enough: Court Nixes Mass Surveillance Suit
FindLaw