Experts warn of eroding counter-terrorism architecture and growing risks 25 years after 9/11 attacks
Security experts warn that the counter-terrorism architecture established after the September 11 attacks is eroding due to budget cuts, personnel losses, and a shift in national security priorities. While there have been no large-scale lethal attacks by foreign terrorist groups in the United States since 2001, analysts suggest that complacency and under-resourcing may increase the risk of future threats.
Show the rest of this summary
During the administration, the focus on counter-terrorism shifted toward strategic competition with revisionist powers like Russia and China, while also expanding the definition of counter-terrorism to include criminal groups such as Mexican drug cartels. Experts noted that the administration's updated counter-terrorism strategy may be more focused on a political agenda than the reality of the threat, spreading dwindling resources thinner. The intelligence community faces challenges including a lack of morale and the loss of experienced officials. Analysts emphasize that while extremist Islamist groups remain a priority, the United States must remain clear-eyed about the changing nature of the terrorist threat to avoid reverting to the conditions that preceded the 2001 attacks.
Sources
-
Analysis: How Trump has failed to learn the lessons of the wars that followed 9/11
CNN
-
‘Institutional neglect’: 25 years on from 9/11, experts sound alarm over US counter-terror efforts
The Guardian
Paywall and unreadable sources
-
Opinion | The 9/11 response got the most important thing right
The Washington Post
-
Opinion | The War on Terror Did Not Fail
The New York Times
-
Did the Terrorists Win?
thedispatch.com