Forensic Psychiatrists Clash Over Mental State of Lindsay Clancy During Trial for Killing Three Children
Prosecutors and defense attorneys are presenting conflicting expert testimony regarding the mental state of Lindsay Clancy during the murder trial for the deaths of her three children. While the defense argues that Lindsay Clancy was suffering from postpartum psychosis, which rendered her unable to conform her conduct to the law, forensic psychiatrist Phillip Resnick testified that she was in a dream-like state and followed a "command hallucination" to kill her children. Conversely, prosecutor witness Avram Mack argued that Lindsay Clancy was experiencing a major depressive episode rather than psychosis, noting that she killed her children methodically and showed awareness of her actions. Mack suggested that her feelings of horror and shame afterward indicated she knew what she was doing was wrong. The trial, which centers on the deaths of her children Cora, Dawson, and Callan, is nearing its conclusion with closing arguments expected early next week. Jurors will soon begin deliberations to determine if Lindsay Clancy should be held criminally responsible for the murders.
Sources
-
News Wrap: Defense rests in murder trial of Lindsay Clancy
PBS
-
A Murder Trial in Massachusetts
The New York Times
-
Opinion | What the tragic case of Lindsay Clancy teaches us about our own biased expectations of parenthood
MS NOW
-
Lindsay Clancy killed her children. Why are so many mothers on her side?
The Times
-
Psychiatrist calls Clancy's mental state into question in testimony after defense rests
ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos