🕒 Created

The administration argues for broad executive privilege to shield private advisers from congressional oversight

The administration announced a new legal strategy to expand the scope of executive privilege, arguing that the president can keep secret not only his conversations with White House staff but also his dealings with private individuals outside the government. This move is intended to shield non-governmental advisers, such as Boris Epshteyn, from being forced to testify or provide documents during congressional investigations. Democratic leaders, including Adam Schiff, have rebuked the White House for this expansive view, arguing that it distorts the intent of executive privilege and may invite corruption by allowing the president to avoid accountability. While the administration defends the position by stating that presidents have historically relied on outside sources, legal experts suggest that courts may not accept the broadest claims. The administration is also challenging the constitutionality of the Presidential Records Act, seeking to offer more leeway to delete communications. These legal markers are being laid down as Democrats prepare to potentially retake control of Congress and increase oversight of the administration's interactions with the private sector.

Sources